The older I get, the more I understand that being an Adventures in Odyssey fan who lives in Canada is difficult. Recently, the official site announced that the newest Adventures in Odyssey album "The Green Ring Conspiracy" is available for download. When I heard this, I couldn't believe my ears. Excited, I grabbed my wallet, pulled out my credit card, and quickly opened my christianbook.com account to download it.
And then this message came up:
You appear to be connecting from a location outside the United States. We have removed the downloadable content from your shopping cart. If you are within the United States verify that you have cookies enabled and try again.I tried again, again and again. Nothing. I even tried inserting my aunt's billing address, who lives in Chicago, to see if that would work. Nope.
And now, defeated and disheartened, I roam the message boards, the official site, and the Odyssey scoop, reading other people's cryptic reactions to the album--not to spoil myself, but to give myself a taste of what I'm missing. I'm missing something, but it'll take a full month to find out what.
This experience has taught me two things; First, I've realized that I haven't reacted like this in a long time; finding out that the album was suddenly available to download was something like winning the lottery--a sensation I hadn't felt since I was young. Back then, getting the latest album for Christmas was a better than any other present. The show has somehow, through its advertisements, interviews, and promos, tapped into that same childhood excitement. And for that, you have my deepest thanks, as well as my congratulations, Adventures in Odyssey.
The second thing that I learned is that being Canadian and also an Adventures in Odyssey fan is no picnic. Due to the fact that a portion of my family was born in the States, I am also an American citizen. As a result, my identity tends to switch back and forth. For instance, when American elections are happen, I do my civic duty, and cast a vote. And when a tragic event occurs in the States, I become emotionally involved in the situation. However, when American politicians do something that I find despicable, I look at the States disapprovingly as a foreigner. I guess you can call me an American flake. Or maybe I am just a hypocrite.
When I listen to Adventures in Odyssey, I sometimes wish I was a pure bred American. As most know, when the show first began, it was named "Odyssey USA"; however, it sometimes feels like the program never shed itself of that name. Throughout the years, we've been bombarded by American historical episodes; "By Dawn's Early light" is about the creation of the American anthem, "The Day Independence Came" is about signing of the Declaration of Independence; "Columbus: the Grand Voyage" is about the discovery of America; "Lincoln" is about America's 16th president; "The Midnight Ride" is about that American quest for independence; "East Winds Raining" is about the attack of Pearl Harbor; "An American Revelation" is about, well, you know. And on and on the list goes...
I'm certainly not complaining. I love historical episodes. But I wonder whether Adventures in Odyssey has a responsibility to depict and tell historical events from other countries that also show the workings of God. Or has the show given the impression that God only lives in, and fights for, America? Take a few minutes and think about that question, and then tell me what you think.
Last summer, I went tree planting in British Columbia, like I do every year. This time, I planted alongside a friend who fought in Afghanistan a few years earlier. He never liked talking about the war and so I never questioned him about it. He also just so happened to be an avid Odyssey listener who, due to his experience in the war, had a problem with the episode "Memories of Jerry". Bordering on propaganda, he said "Memories of Jerry" is a somewhat mistaken, and dangerously misleading episode that communicates that an American who fights for their country is also fighting for God. After he explained his thoughts to me, I went back and listened to the show again. In it, Jerry Whittaker says, "For me, running away to Canada wouldn't be living, not if it meant betraying God, my country, my family. [...] Living is about honoring my commitments." Nowadays, I have trouble fully enjoying "Memories of Jerry", including Jason's penultimate sentence in the episode, "Never forget: Plato was wrong". I understand that the show was trying to make a point about honoring commitments, but the message is confusing. By no means am I advocating anti-patriotism, but is following a sense of duty worth it when you must go and kill someone? These are the same questions splitting even Christian opinion with the recent events in Iraq. When is war worth it? Is it ever?
The episode bothers me, because, as a Canadian, I never quite understood why Plato was wrong for running away. One reason may be because Canada doesn't impose the draft. I understand why Jerry thought he was right, but I saw no problem with Plato not wanting to be forced into a war. Could an American understand this issue better? In other words, does the "Canadian" in me prevent me from understanding this topic fully?
I've recently taken a look at the other Vietnam-themed episode, "The Price of Freedom". It acknowledges both sides of the Vietnam issue: the value of heroism, and the danger of glorifying war. Some issues are difficult to tackle and this episode wisely decides that ambiguity is "the best policy". On the one hand, the episode presents Mr. Altman, who viewed the Vietnam war as a wasted cause; on the other, the episode shows Mr. Whittaker who says, "Mr Altman, here in Odyssey we still take words like honor, and duty, and heroism. They still have a meaning here". That last line stuck out to me. It sounded a lot like Jerry's words to Plato: "I volunteered, as a matter of principle; a principle of duty, of honor. You used to know about those things, Plato". I know I'm usually supposed to adhere to what Whit says, but I wasn't quite sure what was so wrong about Mr. Altman teaching what he believed to be a legitimate view of the war. Meanwhile, in Canada those words, "honor, and duty, and heroism", don't have the same weight. I can't help but wonder whether these are Biblical values or largely American ones. There are moments where my Canadian identity prevents me from fully grasping the content of the show, as with "Memories of Jerry" and "The Price of Freedom".
A difference in perspective is not the only thing that makes a Canadian fan different from the rest; the other reasons, I suppose, are slightly more trivial. For instance, I consider myself the greatest Adventures in Odyssey fan out there (every fan probably thinks the same way about themselves), but because of how far I live from Colorado, I have never had the opportunity to visit Focus on the Family, nor have I been to a live show, and nor have even come into contact with anyone who works for the show. I think back, and ask myself: how much of a fan am I?
And neither have I had the opportunity to curl up next to the radio and listen to the latest Adventures in Odyssey as it first airs. The truth is, Christian radio stations in Canada are scarce, and Christian book stores even more so. Because of this, before shows were heard online, I had to endure hearing the episodes a half a year later than everyone else. I'm pretty sure I was the last one to find out that Hal Smith died.
A Canadian AIO fan has plenty of other things to feel sorry for. For one thing, mail sent doesn't go directly to the Focus on the Family in Colorado. Instead, it gets rerouted to Focus on the Family Canada. I remember one of the show's producers mentioning: "...We respond to every single one of your letters". Not every single one. Here in Canada, we get a response from someone at Focus on the Family Canada saying "Thanks for your mail! We'll be sure to send it to them". Needless to say, that type of response feels a lot less satisfying, and personal. Wouldn't you agree?
And, presuming Odyssey is located in Ohio (as revealed in "Odyssey USA"), I wonder why Canada isn't mentioned more often than the scattered references in "The Underground Railroad", "Memories of Jerry", and "And the Glory". Did Bennett Charles really need to run all the way down to Mexico in "Here today, Gone Tomorrow"? According to my knowledge of geography, Canada might have been the quicker option. Also, why are there so many more references to Spanish heritage, language, and characters than Canadians or French-quebecers? Instead of "The Cross of Cortez" it could have taken place in Canada, and with a little imagination, be called "The Cross of Cartier" in honor of the St. Lawrence river explorer. And I suppose every Canadian felt hurt when the show picked Alaska for its northern setting in "The Black Veil" instead of the hundreds of miles (or should I say kilometers?) of equally cold locations in Canada. Perhaps Novacom thought Canadian brains weren't worth controlling.
Americans may not pay much attention to Canadians, but Canadians sure pay a lot of attention to them. And if you don't believe me, then watch one of your American icons, Tom Brokaw, explain the close relationship between Canadians and Americans:
Don't get me wrong; my point isn't that I want Adventures in Odyssey to feature more scenes in which someone wanders into Whit's End asking for poutine, or where kids play hockey, or someone saying "that Canadian health care system is pretty good, eh?" It isn't a issue of being politically correct and changing the show to attract and allure a greater audience (i.e: Look at us! The Parker family has a Spanish mother!); rather, it is about occasionally acknowledging an existing audience. It is also about being aware of when Christ ceases to be a universal message, and becomes a message molded by country and culture, and values distinct to that culture.
After "Odyssey USA" was released, the vice president of Family Brodcasting suggested that featuring "USA" in the title would alienate non-American listeners--he was smart in doing so. The town is called Odyssey, for it is a uncharted, mythological sort of place. It defies specific location and perhaps, that is its allure, that is its power.
Americans may not pay much attention to Canadians, but Canadians sure pay a lot of attention to them. And if you don't believe me, then watch one of your American icons, Tom Brokaw, explain the close relationship between Canadians and Americans:
Don't get me wrong; my point isn't that I want Adventures in Odyssey to feature more scenes in which someone wanders into Whit's End asking for poutine, or where kids play hockey, or someone saying "that Canadian health care system is pretty good, eh?" It isn't a issue of being politically correct and changing the show to attract and allure a greater audience (i.e: Look at us! The Parker family has a Spanish mother!); rather, it is about occasionally acknowledging an existing audience. It is also about being aware of when Christ ceases to be a universal message, and becomes a message molded by country and culture, and values distinct to that culture.
After "Odyssey USA" was released, the vice president of Family Brodcasting suggested that featuring "USA" in the title would alienate non-American listeners--he was smart in doing so. The town is called Odyssey, for it is a uncharted, mythological sort of place. It defies specific location and perhaps, that is its allure, that is its power.
Great thoughts! You bring up a lot of overlooked ideological points when it comes to Adventures in Odyssey, a few of which I shall comment on...
ReplyDeleteI do agree with you that a few episodes give the impression that "God only fights for the U.S.," but I'm not convinced that AIO does that in more than a handful of episodes. Once you take away the 20 or 30 American-themed episodes (which international broadcasts of AIO do, BTW [with the exception of "Memories of Jerry"]) then you get a general form of western Christianity, with the messages every bit as appropriate for Canadians/ Australians/ New Zealanders as for Americans.
As for the lack of a Canadian/ French influence and an emphasis on Hispanic/ Spanish influence in the town of Odyssey and its stories, my guess is that that has nothing to do with Odyssey's location but more the writers' attempt to portray Odyssey as an average American town which has more of a Hispanic presence than a Canadian presence. And do you really think AIO could find Canadian actors in California? They'd likely have to use American actors for any potential Canadian characters, which I doubt would be well-received!
Also, can the adjective "ambiguous" really be applied to "The Price of Freedom"? I haven't listened to that one for a while, but I do remember feeling that the show was pretty clear in its pro-Vietnam War stance. Even Mr. Altman's view was shown to be misguided: according to the episode, he only felt that way because his son died in the war. Therefore, the episode implies, Mr. Altman is wrong. Whit is the voice of authority who sees that Mr. Altman's reservations toward the war are a way of dealing with his own pain. Yes, the two men may find common ground at the end of the show as they mourn the deaths of their sons, but the two different opinions are by no means given the same worth by Phil Lollar (who wrote both "The Price of Freedom" and "Memories of Jerry," BTW).
Dave
I see your point about the Vietnam episodes, and I don't disagree, but I guess it's the American in me: I want to see Vietnam veterans honored. Men got spit on for going and doing their best when they were told -- to be honest it makes me proud to see a show try to tell kids that their parents, now grandparents, did the only thing they knew to do and that they weren't evil for doing so. I don't think Odyssey is jingoistic, just that it, as most of America is, is proud of the way God has worked in our country -- like anybody should be proud of how God has worked in theirs. And I'd love to see some episodes set in other countries, but then there's always the chance that it would then turn into a documentary-type boring series, with all of the episodes resembling "Pipe Dreams". "And this is the Eiffel tower, built in 1889."
ReplyDeleteLet's be honest. How many 8 year olds want to hear about the grace of God taking place in some country they've never been to? They want -- need -- to see that God is where they are. And since America is Odyssey's largest audience, that's mostly America. Otherwise it becomes what many kids feel the Bible is -- God acting in a far-off place with far-off people. For people in other countries, I understand that that's what Odyssey could be to them, but the fact remains that America is where most of the kids listening are. Also the culture the writers know best.
And just for the record, I live in the states and I've never been to Colorado, or met anyone who works there. :)
Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see episodes involving Canada, and I think it'd be good for the show if done right. Just please understand it from the American side too. :)
We should keep in mind that, as Ben mentioned, this show is no longer called Odyssey USA. Nor does AIO call itself American. According to whitsend.org, the show can be "heard on more than 2,000 broadcast facilities around the world." That's crazy! Yes, perhaps the largest audience is in the States, but should the American kids really be catered to just because they are closer to where they record the show and have easier access? I think we may deem the show American because of all of the historical episodes about the U.S. In actuality, though, AIO is a Christian show. First and foremost.
ReplyDeleteI think part of the 'adventure' in Adventures in Odyssey is that, with the use of the Imagination Station, there aren't any boundaries in time and space. We've travelled with Whit and his gang all over the place; in the past and the future. So why focus so many episodes on the history of one country?
Also, the grace of God DOES take place everywhere and anywhere so why not show kids that? Kids don't have to reach a certain age to be taught this. And wouldn't giving American kids a show that has God working in their country alone encourage them to be in an American Christian bubble?
It's also worth mentioning that AIO describes itself as a show that "brings moral and biblical principles to life." Oh, I enjoy the historical episodes but, I, just like Ben, wonder "whether [they show] Biblical values or largely American ones."
Rachel, you've got a point about the writers knowing American culture best, but perhaps they could do some research, investigating. Or maybe recruit some Canadian writers!
I am thankful that the name was changed those many years ago, but I'm realizing that as a Canadian listener, I still feel alienated.
Though I guess I should be grateful that I can listen to AIO at all! I can't imagine living without this goodness. And I'm sure many people would agree - people ALL over the world.
I don't disagree, Dave, that AIO produces only "a handful" of these types of shows. I'm sure you and I both can point to episodes such as "Hymn Writers", "When In Doubt...Pray", "Amazing Grace", "Something Significant" which have wandered from strictly telling American history. It's interesting to hear that international broadcast strip away the American-themed episodes, but it makes me all the more concerned. Why not leave those episodes in? Shouldn't the message of Christ be appropriate to everyone? If you write an historical episode about your country, and especially one in which you claim God worked within those historical events, you better be sure enough of those truths, and have enough confidence in how the episode conveys those truths, to let the rest of the world hear it.
ReplyDeleteI have no real problem with the lack of Canadian/French influence in the show. Neither am I petitioning for episodes to take place in Canada. I think Rachel Maxwell got it right when she wrote: " the fact remains that America is where most of the kids listening are. Also the culture the writers know best." I wouldn't want the writers to try and portray a culture, or country, they knew nothing about (then again, Canada isn't that complicated). My only concern was whenever the gospel ends up only speaking to one country, and when that message excludes and alienates: "It is also about being aware of when Christ ceases to be a universal message, and becomes a message molded by country and culture, and values distinct to that culture."
To be clear, my comments are observations, not complaints. The post began as a way to rant and blow off steam because I was unable to download album 53. As a result, some bits are exaggerated, while other bits, like my observations of the Vietnam episodes, are serious. I'll admit, it was probably a mistake to combine the two tones. I was merely pointing out general inconsistencies, such as, "Why, since Ohio is so close to Canada, is there hardly any mention of it?" And, unless I'm wrong, the majority of Canadians don't sound very different from Americans anyway. I mean, can you really hear the difference between Canadians like Justin Bieber or Ryan Reynolds and many Americans? If Americans played Canadians, you wouldn't hear any complaints from us.
(Since they won't let me post anything longer, here is "part two":)
ReplyDeleteAnd yes, Dave, I stand by my use of the word "ambiguous". First, I'll agree that Whit is an authoritative figure of the show, and that most listeners will automatically follow whatever he has to say. Regardless, in the same way you argue that Mr. Altman's negative view of Vietnam was the result of his brother's death, you could also argue that Mr. Whittaker's pro-Vietnam War stance is, as is revealed at the end, the result of his own son's death. In other words, Altman despises the war for how it negatively affected those around him, while Whit speaks highly of it because he doesn't want to view the death of his son as "meaningless". Their own views are, in a way, coping mechanisms. As you mentioned, "the two men...find common ground" at the end of the episode. Secondly, unless I'm completely misinterpreting things, the show doesn't go on to show Kirk as "bad"; he's just evolving from the "young boy who liked war reenactments" to a "young boy who realizes the evils of war". Nearing the end of the episode, the audience might expect Kirk's spirits to lift, and have him join the rest of the boys to finish their reenactment, but he doesn't; he's realized a "truth" about war. What also makes the show "ambiguous" is that the show itself is less interested in explaining whether the war was bad, but whether the people themselves, like his father, are worth honoring. And the answer is, clearly, yes. In comparison, "Memories of Jerry" is a whole lot more direct; Jerry practically says that it is "God's will" that he should fight in Vietnam War, and that "Plato is sinning" for running away. "The Price of Freedom", I felt, allowed for more ambiguity. But, yes, both episodes are written by Phil Lollar and so it's easy to conclude that both are pro-Vietnam--and I think "The Price of Freedom" definitely is, but it is also definitely less overt. It shows both sides much better.
I wouldn't be afraid, Rachel Maxwell, that historical episodes from other countries might resemble "Pipe Dreams". The point of the episodes would be to show how God has worked within their own countries, not to ramble off historical facts about the country. And, while I agree kids need to be taught that God works in one's own country, I think it is equally important to show that he works everywhere else as well. If you didn't, the result, as Kait McGee was getting at, is a self-centered, nationalistic gospel. The show has definitely evolved and has become more conscious of the rest of the world over the years. There's no real issue there. But I'll continue to be confused by episodes like "Memories of Jerry"... (which, despite its problems, is actually one of my favorite episodes)
I've been thinking about the Vietnam episodes a lot since they've been brought up, particularly the "Plato portrayed as sinning" part. And I've reached a conclusion which I expect everyone to disagree with: he was. Draft dodging is one of the most selfish and reprehensible actions which can be taken, especially if you are running because you believe the war is wrong. This is because by running, you are forcing someone else to do something you believe is wrong -- wrong enough for you to leave behind everything you know to avoid. (If a man doesn't come when he's called, he's simply replaced by calling up someone else -- you don't just say "Oh well" and send them over short a man.) And I always interpreted Jerry's actions and feelings as resulting from his belief that he was following what he sincerely believed was a calling -- not that it was a calling everyone should follow.
ReplyDeleteI have no intention of starting any sort of debate on this, merely of giving another viewpoint, and I sincerely apologize if my comments come across as abrasive, rude, or provoking; it is certainly not my intent. And I for sure don't have the answers for Vietnam, or the draft, or war. I just agree with Chris's closing wrap to "Price of Freedom": It's hard to know who's right or wrong in a war like Vietnam. We just have to keep believing and knowing that God is in control of everything. (paraphrase)
Again, I would love to see episodes in other countries -- as long as they were well researched, and presented with the ease episodes in America are -- it shouldn't be a huge jolt, not if the intent is to show how God works everywhere. There are hundreds -- thousands -- of stories which have taken place across the globe which are begging to be told. I'd love to hear them on Odyssey, but I want them to be done right. :)
As a side note, if we're going to ask for characters to be from all around the world, I want to toss in a petition for more Southerners; Buck Oliver and Mr. Skint were the first in years that I remember. :)